¹§âA¢
ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ
¸ÀÄvÉÆÛïÉ
¸ÀASÉå:
¹D¸ÀÄE 10 ¸ÉÃE« 2003 ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 12£Éà £ÀªÉA§gï 2003
|
«µÀAiÀÄ
:
|
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¹«¯ï ¸ÉêÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ,
1957gÀCrAiÀÄ°è E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÀÄøvÀ£ÁzÁUÀ,
E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄzÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ.
|
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¹«¯ï ¸ÉêÁ (ªÀVðÃPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¦Ã®Ä) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ
¤AiÀĪÀÄ 8(iv) gÀ GzsÀøvÀ
¨sÁUÀªÀ£ÀÄß F PɼÀUÉ GzÀÞj¹zÉ.
|
''(i)
|
xxxxx
|
|
(ii)
|
xxxxx
|
|
(iii)
|
xxxxx
|
|
(iii-a)
|
xxxxx
|
|
(iv)
|
gÁdå
¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ CxÀªÁ C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁjUÉ JgÀªÀ®Ä PÉÆqÀ¯ÁVvÉÆÛà D
PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ, AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà EvÀgÀ gÁdåzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ, AiÀiÁgÉà ªÀåQÛ, ¸ÀA¸ÉÜ CxÀªÁ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÉ, D C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ ¤®ðPÀë å¢AzÀ CxÀªÁ DeÉÕUÀ¼À G®èAWÀ£É¬ÄAzÀ GAmÁzÀ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ºÀt gÀÆ¥ÀzÀ £ÀµÀÖªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðªÁV CxÀªÁ ¨sÁUÀ±ÀB ªÉÃvÀ£À¢AzÀ
ªÀ¸ÀÆ° ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ.''
|
2.
ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀAvÉ, DyðPÀ £ÀµÀÖªÀ£ÀÄß DgÉÆævÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjAzÀ ªÀ¸ÀÆ®Ä ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁzÀ°è,
¸ÀzÀj ¤AiÀĪÀiÁªÀ½AiÀÄ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 11 CxÀªÁ 12gÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ PÀæªÀĪÀ£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¹
ªÀ¸ÀÆ®Ä ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÁUÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F jÃw ªÉÄÃ¯É w½¹zÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀAvÉ, DgÉÆævÀ
¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjAiÀÄÄ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
£ÀqɸÀÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, DgÉÆævÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÀÄgÀt ºÉÆA¢zÁUÀ, CAvÀºÀ
¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è AiÀiÁªÀ jÃwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄA¢£À PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉƼÀî¨ÉÃPÉA§ §UÉÎ C£ÉÃPÀ
E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸Àà¶ÖÃPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß PÉýªÉ.
3. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ GZÀá £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀĪÀÅ ¸ÉÖÃmï
¨ÁåAPï D¥sï ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ «gÀÄzÀÞ ²æêÀÄw ¸ÀgÉÆÃd ²æäªÁ¸À£ï (LJ¯ïDgï 1997, KAR, 2791) ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è F
PɼÀPÀAqÀAvÉ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ ¥ÀnÖzÉ.
|
|
''If any money has been misappropriated
by an employee who dies during the pendency of inquiry, we cannot say that
monetary liability arises thereto cannot be determined even after the death
of the delinquent employee, the employer should have the liberty to assess
such financial liability which is to be recoverable out of the amounts due to
the deceased employee on notice being given to the concerned heirs and i.e.
the only way by which the proceedings can be concluded. The respondents must
co-operate with the appellants in the enquiry to enable in establishing guilt
or innocence of the deceased employee and the charge against him. On
conclusion of such Inquiry, though no action can be taken against the
deceased, still his monetary liability can be determined. In taking such
action, the appellant will have to take into consideration the question of
amount misappropriated by the deceased employee, the time lapse between the
date of misappropriation and the enquiry and the fact that the deceased
employee is no longer available to defend himself and such other factors. If
they come to the conclusion that still the proceedings should be continued to
recover the amount from out of the amounts due to the said deceased employee,
such steps will have to be taken. Otherwise, any action taken by the
appellants can be criticised as one done arbitrarily without applying the
principles of natural justice. Therefore, we direct the respondents to Inquire
into the matter before making any deductions out of the Provident Fund,
Gratuity or any other amounts due to the deceased employee appropriately one
way or the other after issuing notice to the respondents. If a finding is
recorded that there is any monetary liability as-far-as the deceased employee
is concerned, appropriate deductions can be made from the amounts payable to
the respondents otherwise the amounts due to the deceased employee will have
to be disbursed to the respondents.''
|
4. ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjAzÀ DyðPÀ £ÀµÀÖ GAmÁVzÀÄÝ,
D DgÉÆÃ¥ÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ £ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÁÝUÀ, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ªÀÄgÀt
ºÉÆA¢zÁUÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀĪÀÅ ªÉÄÃ¯É C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ¥ÀlÖAvÉ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ
¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀæªÀĪÀ£ÀÄß dgÀÄV¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ.
5. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¥ÀæzsÁ£À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ,
PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ, ªÉÄîÌAqÀ ¸ÀÆZÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß J¯Áè
¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ²¸ÀÄÛ ¥Áæ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À UÀªÀÄ£ÀPÉÌ vÀgÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÉÆÃgÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
|
¦Dgï. 1453
|
JZï. Dgï. £ÁUÉÃAzÀæ
¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ
C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðŠ2
¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ,
(¸ÉêÁ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ).
|
No comments:
Post a Comment